On this page
Using AI on a school assignment is not cheating by default, and it is not automatically fine either. The line depends on two things: whether the thinking in the work you submit is yours, and whether your school allows the kind of help you used. Here is how exam bodies draw that line, a simple way to place your own use on it, and what to check before you hand anything in.
Where do exam bodies draw the line on AI help?
The clearest published rules come from exam bodies that run coursework. The UK's Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) defines AI misuse as using an AI tool without properly acknowledging it and submitting work for assessment "when it is not their own" (JCQ guidance on AI use in assessments). Its examples include copying or paraphrasing sections of AI-generated content, using AI to complete parts of an assessment so the work no longer reflects the student's own "analysis, evaluation or calculations", and failing to acknowledge AI used as a source of information.
The International Baccalaureate took a similar position in early 2023. It chose not to ban tools like ChatGPT, but said AI-generated content must be credited and referenced, and that it does not regard work produced, even only in part, by such tools as the student's own (Careers360 report of the IB statement).
Your school, coaching institute or board in India may have different rules, or none written down yet, which is why the checking step below matters.
A four-level test for your own AI use
Mike Perkins, Leon Furze and colleagues proposed an AI Assessment Scale so that teachers can state, for each task, how much AI use is appropriate (Perkins et al. 2024). You can borrow a simplified version of the idea and ask which of these levels you were at:
No AI. You did the work from your own notes, textbook and memory.
AI as a teacher. You asked an AI to explain a concept or give a hint, then closed it and wrote the work yourself.
AI as a reviewer. You wrote a full draft first, then asked AI to point out errors or unclear steps, and you made the fixes yourself.
AI as an author. Some words, steps, calculations or diagrams in what you submit came from the AI.
Level 4 is where most of JCQ's examples of misuse sit. Note that JCQ also expects you to acknowledge AI used as a source of information, so even level 2 can need a mention. Levels 2 and 3 are often allowed, but some tasks, such as an in-class test or a practical record, allow no AI at all. When in doubt, ask before you start, not after you submit.
Why copying hurts your learning, not only your grade
There is a learning cost too. In a field experiment with nearly a thousand high school maths students, those given a plain ChatGPT-style assistant did better while they had it, but once access was removed they scored 17% lower than students who never had it (Bastani et al. 2025, PNAS). A version with prompts designed to safeguard learning largely avoided that drop. The authors describe students without guardrails trying to use the AI as a "crutch". Assignments exist to build the skill you will need in the exam hall, where there is no chatbot.
We compare the two kinds of tool in AI tutors vs answer chatbots, and parents can find a family-level view in should children use ChatGPT for homework.
How to check your school's policy in five minutes
Look for a written rule. Check the school handbook, the assignment sheet or the board's coursework instructions for the words "AI", "ChatGPT" or "generative".
Ask per task. "Can I use AI to check my draft for this project?" is a fair question for a teacher. Rules can differ between a homework sheet and a graded project.
Keep a record. JCQ asks students to name the tool and the date, keep a non-editable copy (such as a screenshot) of the questions asked and the AI's output, and briefly explain how it was used.
Acknowledge in writing. A line such as "I used ChatGPT on 12 March to check my explanation of Le Chatelier's principle; all text is my own" makes your use visible.
When the rule is unclear, choose the lower level. Using AI only as a teacher, then writing on your own, rarely gets anyone into trouble.
Using AI so the thinking stays yours
The safest use is the one that makes you think more: ask for a hint instead of a solution, ask the AI to quiz you, or ask it to find the mistake in your working without fixing it. Our guide to ChatGPT prompts for physics that make you think has examples.
Fermi's AI tutor is built to teach rather than answer: it notices where you are stuck and decides whether to explain, ask or show, so you work through the steps yourself. Your school's rules still apply to anything you submit.
Your next step: find your school's AI rule today, before the next assignment is due.
