On this page
Every Class 11 student draws benzene as a flat hexagon. But for decades after August Kekulé proposed the ring in 1865, no one had measured whether it was really flat or puckered like a chair. In 1929 a young physicist named Kathleen Lonsdale answered the question with X-rays. This post covers who she was, why benzene was hard to study, a worked example of the geometry she tested, and what her way of working can teach you.
Who was Kathleen Lonsdale?
Dorothy Hodgkin's Royal Society memoir of Lonsdale records that Kathleen Yardley was born in Newbridge, in the south of Ireland, on 28 January 1903, the youngest of ten children in a poor family. She died on 1 April 1971 and had been elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1945.
Her 1929 paper shows where she was working at the time. In it she thanks Bedford College, London, for a scholarship that let her work in the physics laboratories of the University of Leeds, and the chemist Christopher Ingold for supplying the material she studied.
Why was the shape of benzene still an open question?
Kekulé's ring explained a great deal of chemistry (our post on Kekulé and the structure of benzene covers that story). It did not settle the ring's real shape in space.
X-ray crystallography could, in principle, because X-rays scattered by a crystal reveal how its atoms are arranged (see W. L. Bragg and the X-ray law). But the opening of Lonsdale's paper, The structure of the benzene ring in C6(CH3)6, lists the problems. Benzene itself is not crystalline at ordinary temperatures, so chemists had to study its derivatives. Earlier work had found the ring was centrosymmetric and about 2.49 Å wide, but that could not decide between a puckered ring built like diamond and a flat ring built like graphite. And the crystals studied so far always had more than one molecule in each unit cell, which made the arrangement hard to untangle.
What did she find?
Hexamethylbenzene, a benzene ring with a methyl group on every carbon, turned out to be free of that difficulty. Its unit cell was triclinic and held one molecule only.
Her summary reports that the measured intensities fit a hexagonal structure, and that the carbon atoms "at least must all lie within 0·1 Å" of one plane. The ring was similar in shape and size to the six-carbon ring in graphite, with carbon atoms 1.42 Å apart. In 1931 she followed this with an analysis of hexachlorobenzene using the Fourier method, checking whether the ring kept the same shape in another compound.
Worked example: flat ring or puckered ring?
Her paper compares two models.
Puckered, like diamond. Carbon atoms 1.54 Å apart. The paper says this predicts a ring width of 2.52 Å and repeat distances of 1.26 and 2.52 Å.
Flat, like graphite. Carbon atoms 1.42 Å apart. Predicted width 2.46 Å and repeat distances of 1.23 and 2.46 Å.
Check the flat model yourself. A regular hexagon with side a has a width across its flat sides of √3 × a.
√3 ≈ 1.732.
Width = 1.732 × 1.42 ≈ 2.46 Å. This matches the paper.
Half of that, 1.23 Å, is the smaller repeat distance.
Why the old data could not decide. The earlier estimate of the width was 2.49 Å. The two predictions are 2.46 and 2.52 Å, and their average is (2.46 + 2.52) ÷ 2 = 2.49 Å. The measurement sat exactly halfway between the models. A difference of 0.06 Å, about 2 percent, needed a cleaner crystal and a full analysis.
Common mistakes:
Confusing bond length with ring width. The side of the hexagon is the C–C distance; the width is √3 times larger.
Thinking X-rays photograph atoms. Her summary notes that simple measurements did not show the hexagon directly. It appeared only after she calculated structure factors from the intensities.
Treating "flat" as the whole story. Flatness fits Kekulé's ring, but it does not by itself tell you how the bonds share their electrons. That is where the resonance picture in our Kekulé post comes in.
What else did she do?
A 2009 study of her papers by the historian Melinda Baldwin describes how, as a married woman and mother, she often faced the assumption that she should not have a scientific career. In the early 1930s she left research for a time to care for her young children. Wanting to work from home, she took on the creation of crystallographic reference tables, which became one of her most significant projects.
What can a student take from how she worked?
Lonsdale did not attack the hardest case head-on. She looked for a compound that removed the main source of confusion, one molecule per cell, and only then made her measurement. She also stated exactly what each model predicted before comparing it with data. That habit, writing down what each idea predicts, works in exams too.
If resonance and aromatic rings still feel shaky, the Fermi Concept Library covers every concept in physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics and computing, so you can check one idea at a time.
Try it now: draw a hexagon with 1.42 cm sides, measure its width across the flat sides, and compare it with √3 × 1.42.
