On this page
You are sure the formula has a 2 in the denominator. You remember the page. Then you check, and it does not. Most students have had this happen and blamed tiredness. Elizabeth Loftus would say it is how memory normally works. Her experiments show that remembering is partly rebuilding, and that what you hear after an event can quietly become part of the memory.
Who is Elizabeth Loftus?
Loftus is a Distinguished Professor at the University of California, Irvine, with a PhD from Stanford. Her UCI faculty page sums up her research in one line: her experiments reveal how memories can be changed by things that we are told. Much of her work has been applied in courts, where eyewitness memory can decide a case.
Can one word in a question change what people remember?
In Loftus and Palmer (1974), 45 students at the University of Washington watched seven short films of traffic accidents. Afterwards they were asked how fast the cars were going when they "smashed", "collided", "bumped", "hit" or "contacted" each other. Only the verb changed. The average estimates were:
smashed: 40.8 mph
collided: 39.3 mph
bumped: 38.1 mph
hit: 34.0 mph
contacted: 31.8 mph
People were also poor at the real speeds. For four staged crashes at 20, 30, 40 and 40 mph, the average estimates were 37.7, 36.2, 39.7 and 36.1 mph.
A second experiment asked whether the word changed the memory itself or only the answer. A new group of 150 students watched one film. Fifty were asked the "smashed" question, fifty the "hit" question and fifty were not asked about speed. A week later, without seeing the film again, they were asked: "Did you see any broken glass?" There was no broken glass in the film. Sixteen of the fifty "smashed" students said yes, against seven in the "hit" group and six in the group with no speed question.
Can people remember whole events that never happened?
Later Loftus went further. In The Formation of False Memories (1995), she and Jacqueline Pickrell worked with 24 people aged 18 to 53. Each received four short stories about their childhood, written with help from an older relative. Three were true. One was invented: getting lost in a shopping mall at about age five and being helped by an elderly woman.
People remembered something about 49 of the 72 true events (68%). For the false event, 7 of the 24 (29%) remembered it fully or partially in their first written answers, and 6 (25%) still did across two later interviews. The false memories were described in fewer words (a mean of 49.9 against 138.0 for true ones) and were rated as less clear. At the end, 19 of the 24 picked out the invented story correctly. Everyone was told the truth about the study.
In a 2005 review of 30 years of this research, Loftus described the misinformation effect, the change in memory that follows misleading information, and noted that warnings about possible misinformation help only under limited circumstances.
What does this mean for how you study?
Loftus's research is about eyewitnesses, not exams, so the step to revision is ours, not hers. Still, the mechanism is the same one you rely on when you revise.
Treat confidence as a feeling, not a fact. The false memories in these studies sometimes came with real detail. A formula that feels certain still needs checking against the textbook. Our post on judgments of learning explains why your sense of knowing can mislead you.
Check the source, not a retelling. A friend's version of a derivation, or your own rough notes, can carry an error into your memory. Go back to the NCERT text or your teacher's worked solution.
Correct errors quickly. When you get a question wrong, write the correct version straight away and test yourself on it again later, so the right version is the one you rebuild.
Watch for leading questions in group study. "It's mg sin θ here, right?" shapes the answer. Ask "Which component of gravity acts along the incline?" instead.
Be wary of feeling familiar. Rereading makes material feel known. Our post on the illusion of fluency shows why recall tests are a better check.
When you are unsure whether you remember a method correctly, compare your attempt with a complete solution. The Fermi Problem Library has worked problems with a step-by-step solver that explains the reasoning, so you can check each step against something other than memory. For the other side of the story, where memories are stored but hard to reach, read our post on Endel Tulving and episodic memory.
Today, pick three formulas you feel sure of, write them from memory, and check each one against your textbook.
