On this page
You cannot see an electric field. A wave travels while the material mostly stays put. A quantum state is not a picture of anything you could photograph. Your textbook usually gives one figure per idea, and research on learning suggests one is often not enough.
Why is one diagram often not enough for hard physics ideas?
The DeFT framework from psychologist Shaaron Ainsworth says multiple representations help learning in three ways: they complement each other, one constrains how you read another, and together they help you construct a deeper understanding (Ainsworth and Van Labeke; full framework in Learning and Instruction, 2006). In physics terms, a sketch of a ball's path, a velocity-time graph and an equation each show something the others hide.
Ainsworth and Van Labeke add a warning: you first have to learn how each representation works, such as what a graph's gradient or intercept tells you. That is why a graph can feel useless until someone shows you how to read it.
Spatial skill matters too. In three studies of kinematics problems, most students with lower spatial visualisation ability did not combine two motion vectors, could not switch frames of reference, and tended to read graphs literally, as pictures of the motion (Kozhevnikov, Motes and Hegarty, Cognitive Science, 2007). Those are exactly the places to slow down and draw.
Does drawing your own diagrams actually help?
It can, when the drawing is correct and detailed in the right places. A two-year study of free-body diagrams found that students who drew diagrams correctly were significantly more successful at getting the right answer, and that high-achieving students also used their diagrams to check their work (Rosengrant, Van Heuvelen and Etkina, 2009).
A later study of two electrostatics problems found a similar pattern: students who drew productive diagrams were more successful problem solvers, and more relevant detail in a diagram went with a better score (Maries and Singh, European Journal of Physics, 2018). These studies show a link, not proof that any doodle helps. The diagram has to carry the physics: every force, its direction, where it acts.
When is a simulation better than a textbook figure?
Often when the idea is about change, or about something you cannot see. In a University of Colorado study, students who worked with a circuit simulation that modelled electron flow outperformed students using real equipment, both on a conceptual survey and on assembling a real circuit and describing how it worked (Finkelstein and colleagues, 2005).
The PhET simulations from the same university are free online, and they are designed with students, not just for them: PhET says between four and six think-aloud interviews with individual students are done with each simulation. For quantum mechanics, the University of St Andrews QuVis project offers simulations on superposition, measurement, potential wells and spin.
If an idea is easier to see than to read, the Fermi Simulation Lab has interactive simulations for exactly that kind of idea.
Which visual should you use for each physics topic?
Electric and magnetic fields: sketch field lines by hand (closer lines mean a stronger field; lines never cross), then compare with a simulation. Iron filings around a magnet show the magnetic field pattern.
Waves: draw two graphs. Displacement against position is a snapshot of the wave; displacement against time follows one particle. A slinky shows both.
Rotation: use your right hand for the direction of angular velocity and torque, and a pencil as the axis. Draw each force where it acts, because torque depends on where.
Quantum states: do not draw the particle. Draw the probability density, and use a simulation to watch it change with the potential.
Relative motion: sketch the scene from each frame of reference, side by side.
Circuits: build it in a simulation that shows current, then draw the diagram from memory.
How can you practise visualising one hard idea?
Write the idea in one sentence, in your own words.
Sketch it from memory, without the book.
Add a second representation: a graph, or the equation with each symbol labelled on your sketch.
Predict what happens if you change one thing, then test it in a simulation or with a physical model.
Fix your sketch where the prediction went wrong.
Explain the final sketch aloud to someone, briefly.
Parents can help with step 6 without knowing the physics. Ask: "Point to where the field is strongest. How does your drawing show that?" If the sketch keeps breaking at the same spot, the gap is often an underlying concept; the Fermi Concept Library gives each concept in physics its own lesson and its place in the map.
Pick one idea from this week's chapter and try the routine tonight.
