On this page
A detector that reads zero usually means there is nothing to detect. In 1958 a reading that dropped towards zero told James Van Allen the opposite: there was so much radiation that his counter could not keep up. This post covers who he was, how the first American satellites found the radiation belts, a worked example on why charged particles stay trapped around Earth, and what you can take from the way he worked.
Who was James Van Allen?
The University of Iowa's profile records that Van Allen was born in Mount Pleasant, Iowa, on 7 September 1914, and earned an MS in 1936 and a PhD in nuclear physics in 1939 at the University of Iowa. During the Second World War he worked on radio proximity fuses for anti-aircraft shells. Afterwards, at Johns Hopkins, he flew Geiger tube instruments on captured German V-2 rockets, giving the first measurements of cosmic rays above the atmosphere.
In 1951 he returned to Iowa as head of the physics department. There he developed the "rockoon", a low-cost rocket carried up by a balloon, and used rockets launched from ships to survey cosmic rays at different latitudes during the International Geophysical Year of 1957 to 1958.
What did Explorer 1 actually measure?
Explorer 1 was launched from Cape Canaveral on 31 January 1958. NASA's history of the launch says the satellite weighed 30 pounds, of which more than 18 pounds were instruments developed under Van Allen, and that its orbit of 224 by 1,575 miles was higher than planned.
The surprise came from the cosmic-ray detector. According to the same page, it "indicated a much lower cosmic ray count than expected", and Van Allen proposed that the instrument was saturated by energetic charged particles trapped by Earth's magnetic field. A NASA feature from 2018 describes the pattern: radiation levels far above expectations, then, above about 900 miles, no counts at all.
The Iowa profile explains that a similar instrument flew on Explorer 3, which carried a tape recorder so that data could be obtained for an entire orbit. NASA's Explorer 1 page adds that Explorer 3 launched on 26 March 1958, and that instruments on Explorer IV and Pioneer 3 later showed a second, outer belt. The team's first report was Observation of High Intensity Radiation by Satellites 1958 Alpha and Gamma, and Van Allen and Louis Frank followed it with a paper on radiation to a radial distance of 107,400 km.
Why do charged particles stay trapped? A worked example
The NCERT Class 12 chapter Moving Charges and Magnetism gives the tools. A charge moving perpendicular to a field B moves in a circle of radius r = mv/qB, with frequency ν = qB/2πm. Any velocity component along the field is unchanged, so the path is a helix around the field line.
Take a proton with a kinetic energy of 1 MeV in a field of 5.0 × 10⁻⁶ T. These are sample numbers chosen for practice, not measurements from Explorer 1. Use the NIST values m = 1.673 × 10⁻²⁷ kg and q = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C.
Energy in joules. 1 MeV = 1.602 × 10⁻¹³ J.
Speed. v = √(2E/m) = √(2 × 1.602 × 10⁻¹³ ÷ 1.673 × 10⁻²⁷) = 1.38 × 10⁷ m/s, under 5% of the speed of light, so the non-relativistic formula is fine.
Radius. r = mv/qB = (1.673 × 10⁻²⁷ × 1.38 × 10⁷) ÷ (1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ × 5.0 × 10⁻⁶) ≈ 2.9 × 10⁴ m, about 29 km.
Frequency. ν = qB/2πm = (1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ × 5.0 × 10⁻⁶) ÷ (2π × 1.673 × 10⁻²⁷) ≈ 76 Hz.
Compare 29 km with Earth's mean radius of 6,371 km from the NASA Earth fact sheet. The circle is tiny, so the proton stays tied to its field line, spiralling along it. That is the basic reason the belts exist: Earth's field guides charged particles instead of letting them fly off. NASA's 2018 feature notes that the inner belt is mostly protons and the outer belt mostly electrons.
Common mistakes:
Using the full speed in r = mv/qB. Only the component perpendicular to B sets the radius.
Forgetting the unit change. MeV must become joules before you take the square root.
Treating MeV electrons classically. An electron with 1 MeV moves close to light speed, so the classical formula fails. That is why this example uses a proton.
If you can follow the algebra but cannot picture the spiral, Fermi's Simulation Lab has interactive simulations for ideas that are easier to see than read. For more practice, our post on charged particle motion and the cyclotron uses the same equations.
What happened to the belts and to Van Allen?
The Iowa profile records that Van Allen supplied particle detectors for twenty spacecraft, and that instruments on Pioneer 10 and 11 showed Jupiter and Saturn also have intense radiation belts. He received the US National Medal of Science in 1987 and the Crafoord Prize in 1989, kept involving students in his research, and kept working on cosmic rays until his death at 91.
The belts still hold surprises. NASA's Van Allen Probes, launched on 30 August 2012, gathered data for almost seven years and showed that a temporary third belt can form during intense solar activity.
What can a student take from Van Allen's way of working?
Question a strange reading. A low count could have been dismissed as a fault. He asked what could make the instrument fall silent.
Know your instrument's limits. Saturation was only a sensible idea because he understood how a Geiger counter behaves when overloaded.
Get better data before arguing. The tape recorder on Explorer 3 gave data for whole orbits, not just snapshots.
Build cheaply if you must. The rockoon reached high altitudes without an expensive rocket.
Try it now: redo the worked example for a 10 MeV proton and check that the radius grows by a factor of √10.
