On this page
Many olympiad students quietly believe that being a mathematician means solving problems fast. Akshay Venkatesh was one of the fastest young problem solvers of his generation, and that belief nearly drove him out of mathematics. Then he won the Fields Medal. This post covers his path, what the International Mathematical Union said his work achieved, a factorisation example from his area that you can check by hand, and what his experience means for students who are good at exams.
Who is Akshay Venkatesh?
A Quanta Magazine profile from 2018 tells the early story. His parents moved from New Delhi to Perth, Australia, when he was two. He won medals in the physics and mathematics olympiads at ages 11 and 12, started university at 13, and completed a mathematics degree with first-class honours at the University of Western Australia at 16. The official IMO results for Australia record his 1994 bronze medal, with 28 points out of 42.
He then went to Princeton, where, according to the Clay Mathematics Institute, he took his PhD in 2002 under Peter Sarnak. He later worked at Stanford and the Institute for Advanced Study.
Why did he nearly leave mathematics?
This is the part of the story most worth knowing. Quanta reports that at Princeton he was startled to discover that "there are a lot of people who are just as good at the things you thought defined being a mathematician, like being able to learn the material or solve problems fast." Research, with its dead ends and no answer key, felt very different from problem sets. He judged his own dissertation mediocre and started looking at other careers, even working one summer at his uncle's machine learning start-up.
He also told Quanta: "In retrospect I'm not so fond of the idea of Olympiads. I think if that was what mathematicians really did, I wouldn't enjoy being a mathematician." He values the friendships from olympiads more than the competition.
What did he win the Fields Medal for?
The IMU's citation honours him "for his synthesis of analytic number theory, homogeneous dynamics, topology, and representation theory, which has resolved long-standing problems in areas such as the equidistribution of arithmetic objects." In plain words: he took tools from distant parts of mathematics and used them on old questions about whole numbers.
The IMU's account of his work gives three examples.
Quadratic forms. When can one quadratic form in m variables represent another in n variables? In 1978 Hsia, Kitaoka and Kneser proved it works when m ≥ 2n + 3. In 2008 Venkatesh and Jordan Ellenberg showed m ≥ n + 5 is enough, using ideas from dynamical systems: lattice points flowing like dust in a breeze.
Class numbers. Henri Cohen and Hendrik Lenstra predicted in 1984 that about 43% of class numbers are divisible by 3, not the one-third you might expect. In 2016 Venkatesh, Ellenberg and Craig Westerland proved cases of these predictions for function fields by translating the problem into topology.
New conjectures. His recent work proposes links between the topology of certain spaces and number theory, connected to the Langlands programme and to the methods Andrew Wiles used for Fermat's last theorem.
The IMU wrote that most mathematicians are either problem-solvers or theory-builders, and Venkatesh is both.
A worked example: when factorisation stops being unique
Every whole number factors into primes in exactly one way. The IMU uses a ring of numbers a + b√−5, with a and b whole numbers, to show that this can fail.
One factorisation of 9 is 3 × 3.
Another is (2 + √−5)(2 − √−5). Expand it: 2 × 2 − (√−5)² = 4 − (−5) = 9.
In this ring, 3, 2 + √−5 and 2 − √−5 cannot be broken down further, and the two factorisations are genuinely different.
The class number measures how badly unique factorisation fails in a ring like this. For ordinary integers it is 1. The common mistake when expanding is to write (√−5)² = 5 instead of −5; keep track of the sign of i² = −1 exactly as you do in JEE complex numbers.
What can a student take from Venkatesh's way of working?
Do not judge yourself only by speed. He was fast and still doubted himself in research. In your preparation, value the problems you understood deeply, not just the ones you finished quickly.
Borrow tools from other chapters. His results came from bringing dynamics and topology into number theory. In JEE, coordinate geometry can solve a trigonometry problem and calculus can solve a physics one.
Keep the friendships. He values olympiad friends over medals. Study groups that explain ideas to each other last longer than rankings.
Ask for help when you doubt. He considered leaving and stayed. If self-doubt or stress is weighing on you, talk to someone; in India, Tele MANAS, the government's free mental health helpline, is on 14416 or 1-800-891-4416.
If you are not sure where to begin with a hard topic, Fermi's AI tutor works out what you already know and builds a plan for the session, so you start from a clear next step.
Try this today: show that 6 = 2 × 3 = (1 + √−5)(1 − √−5) by expanding the second product.
