On this page
Le Chatelier's principle tells you which way a disturbed equilibrium shifts, but it is a rule of thumb, and it is easy to misapply when two things change at once. The reaction quotient Q gives you the same answer by calculation. You build Q from the concentrations you actually have, compare it with K, and the direction follows. This post shows three situations where Q settles the question: diluting a gas mixture, mixing two solutions, and a reaction with a solid in it.
Where is this in the syllabus?
The JEE (Main) 2026 syllabus and the NEET (UG) 2026 syllabus list the law of chemical equilibrium, Kp and Kc "and their significance", and the significance of ΔG and ΔG° in Unit 6, Equilibrium. The JEE (Advanced) 2026 brochure names the "reaction quotient" directly. NCERT Class 11 Chemistry, Unit 6 Equilibrium (2026-27 reprint), defines Q in section 6.6.2 and links it to Gibbs energy in section 6.7. Check your own year's syllabus.
What is Q, and how is it different from K?
NCERT defines Q "in the same way as the equilibrium constant Kc except that the concentrations in Qc are not necessarily equilibrium values". For aA + bB ⇌ cC + dD,
Qc = [C]ᶜ[D]ᵈ / [A]ᵃ[B]ᵇ
Use partial pressures instead and you get Qp. The rule, in NCERT's words:
If Qc < Kc, net reaction goes from left to right.
If Qc > Kc, net reaction goes from right to left.
If Qc = Kc, no net reaction occurs.
K is fixed at a given temperature. Q changes every time you add, remove, dilute or compress something.
Why does Q decide the direction?
NCERT section 6.7 gives ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q, and at equilibrium ΔG° = −RT ln K. Put them together and
ΔG = RT ln(Q/K)
If Q < K, the log is negative, ΔG is negative, and the forward reaction is spontaneous. If Q > K, ΔG is positive and the reverse reaction runs. The comparison is not a memory rule; it is the sign of ΔG.
Worked example 1: diluting an equilibrium mixture
NCERT's Problem 6.3 gives an equilibrium mixture at 500 K of 1.59 M PCl₃, 1.59 M Cl₂ and 1.41 M PCl₅ for PCl₅ ⇌ PCl₃ + Cl₂.
Kc = (1.59 × 1.59)/1.41 = 1.79.
Now double the volume at 500 K. Every concentration halves: 0.795 M, 0.795 M and 0.705 M.
Qc = (0.795 × 0.795)/0.705 = 0.896.
Qc < Kc, so more PCl₅ dissociates.
Qc is exactly half of Kc here, because the top has two concentrations and the bottom one. So ΔG = RT ln(1/2) = 8.314 × 500 × (−0.693) ≈ −2.9 kJ mol⁻¹ at the moment of dilution.
To find the new equilibrium, let x M of PCl₅ react: (0.795 + x)²/(0.705 − x) = 1.79. Solving the quadratic gives x ≈ 0.178, so [PCl₅] ≈ 0.527 M and [PCl₃] = [Cl₂] ≈ 0.973 M. Check: 0.973²/0.527 ≈ 1.79.
This is the Le Chatelier prediction, that lower pressure favours the side with more gas moles, obtained without the principle.
Worked example 2: will a precipitate form?
NCERT says the expression for Ksp, filled in with non-equilibrium concentrations, is Qsp, and that comparing the two "gives the direction of the processes of precipitation or dissolution". It gives Ksp for barium sulphate at 298 K as 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰.
Mix equal volumes of 2.0 × 10⁻⁵ M BaCl₂ and 2.0 × 10⁻⁵ M Na₂SO₄.
Mixing doubles the volume, so each ion is now 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ M.
Qsp = [Ba²⁺][SO₄²⁻] = 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁰.
Qsp < Ksp, so no precipitate forms.
If you forget step 1 and use 2.0 × 10⁻⁵ M for each ion, you get 4.0 × 10⁻¹⁰ and wrongly predict a precipitate. With 4.0 × 10⁻⁵ M solutions, the mixed concentrations are 2.0 × 10⁻⁵ M, Qsp = 4.0 × 10⁻¹⁰ > Ksp, and barium sulphate does precipitate. Our post on the solubility product covers the Ksp side in more depth.
Worked example 3: a solid in the equation
For CaCO₃(s) ⇌ CaO(s) + CO₂(g), pure solids stay out of both K and Q, so Qp = p(CO₂). Suppose, as a sample value, Kp = 0.20 bar at the furnace temperature, and the vessel holds CO₂ at 0.10 bar. Qp < Kp, so more CaCO₃ decomposes until p(CO₂) reaches 0.20 bar. Adding more solid CaCO₃ changes nothing, because it does not appear in Q.
Why do students misread equilibrium shifts?
Quílez-Pardo and Solaz-Portolés (1995) gave a written equilibrium test to 170 first-year university chemistry students and a related problem to 40 chemistry teachers. They traced misconceptions to misapplying Le Chatelier's principle, rote algorithms, poor control of variables and "limited use of the chemical equilibrium law". Writing Q is that law used directly. For the basics of what goes into K, see our guide to chemical equilibrium problems.
Which mistakes cost marks?
Building Q from concentrations before mixing.
Putting solids or pure liquids into Q.
Comparing Qc with Kp, or Qp with Kc. Compare like with like.
Saying K changed after dilution. Only temperature changes K.
Writing Q for a different form of the equation than the K you were given.
A practice routine
For each of the three examples, write Q, compare it with K, and state the direction in one sentence.
Redo example 1 for halving the volume instead. Which way does it go?
Find the largest equal concentration of Ba²⁺ and SO₄²⁻ that can coexist without a precipitate.
Space these over a week and test yourself without notes; Dunlosky and colleagues (2013) rated practice testing and spaced practice as high utility.
If a step in a long equilibrium problem keeps going wrong, the Fermi Problem Library has worked problems with a step-by-step solver that explains the reasoning rather than printing an answer.
Today, take the last equilibrium question you got wrong and redo it by writing Q first.
